<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><?xml-stylesheet title="XSL formatting" type="text/xsl" href="http://iwi.gandibar.net/feed/rss2/xslt" ?><rss version="2.0"
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
  xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
  xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
  <title>Gandi IWI Blog - Gandi IWI</title>
  <link>http://iwi.gandibar.net/</link>
  <atom:link href="http://iwi.gandibar.net/feed/category/Gandi-IWI/rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
  <description></description>
  <language>en</language>
  <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 13:54:10 +0100</pubDate>
  <copyright></copyright>
  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
  <generator>Dotclear</generator>
  
    
  <item>
    <title>DNS flaw : corrected on the first day</title>
    <link>http://iwi.gandibar.net/post/2008/07/25/DNS-flaw-%3A-corrected-on-the-first-day</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:md5:31cf021aa860a4087de17fc39a8987ce</guid>
    <pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 01:12:00 +0200</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
        <category>Gandi IWI</category>
            
    <description>    &lt;p&gt;On July 8, 2008, the US-CERT (United States Computer Emergency Readiness
Team) &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/800113&quot; hreflang=&quot;en&quot;&gt;announced&lt;/a&gt; that they had
discovered a new way to quickly take advantage of weaknesses in the DNS
&lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domain_Name_System&quot; hreflang=&quot;en&quot;&gt;protocol&lt;/a&gt;. This
method targets non updated 'recursive' servers, allowing the 'attacker'
to fake an answer as coming from an 'authoritative' server.&lt;/p&gt;


&lt;p&gt;Gandi, as a registrar, only owns 'authoritative' servers and was not
affected by this flaw.&lt;br /&gt; However, we are also a webhost now, and our
customers go through 'recursive' servers.
These servers were updated by our technical team, just a few hours after
the announcement.&lt;/p&gt;



&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;All right, but what are &lt;em&gt;recursive&lt;/em&gt; and &lt;em&gt;authoritative&lt;/em&gt; names servers?&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;


&lt;p&gt;There are two types of name servers:&lt;/p&gt;


&lt;p&gt;1. The &lt;em&gt;recursive&lt;/em&gt; servers, when questioned, get the information from
other servers.&lt;/p&gt;


&lt;p&gt;2. The &lt;em&gt;authoritative&lt;/em&gt; servers have the information requested by (among others)
recursive servers.&lt;/p&gt;


&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Recursive&lt;/em&gt; servers are those usually provided by ISPs or webhosts for
their customers.&lt;br /&gt; To simplify : when someone enters the URL of a
domain name in his web browser, if the domain is entirely managed by
Gandi, a DNS request goes from his computer to his ISP's &lt;em&gt;recursive&lt;/em&gt;
server, which in turn, requests the information from Gandi's
&lt;em&gt;authoritative&lt;/em&gt; server, and get the address of this domain name.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;


&lt;p&gt;Gandi's &lt;em&gt;authoritative&lt;/em&gt; server answers politely to the &lt;em&gt;recursive&lt;/em&gt;
server, which temporarily stores the answer in a &lt;em&gt;cache&lt;/em&gt;, and finally,
the answer is transmitted to the browser.
The temporary &lt;em&gt;cache&lt;/em&gt; is used to speed up the answers to a
''recursive' server, and thus avoid too much repetition of the same
question. This way, there are less exchanges between ''recursive&amp;quot;
and &lt;em&gt;authoritative&lt;/em&gt; servers, and the Internet's general behavior is
improved.&lt;/p&gt;


&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;And so?&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;


&lt;p&gt;This new method allows a bad person to trap a vulnerable &lt;em&gt;recursive&lt;/em&gt;
server into believing that an answer comes from an
&lt;em&gt;authoritative&lt;/em&gt; server. The &lt;em&gt;recursive&lt;/em&gt; server, sure that the answer
is correct, stores it in its &lt;em&gt;cache&lt;/em&gt;. Does this sound abstract?&lt;br /&gt;
Just imagine that you have the ability to pretend to an ISP's customers
that you are gandi.net, gmail.com or even amazon.com, and do this for
serveral hours at a time... You get the picture.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;


&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;What you should bear in mind (for our more technical readers)&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;



&lt;p&gt;First of all, the flaw of the DNS protocol is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.openbsd.org/advisories/res_random.txt&quot; hreflang=&quot;en&quot;&gt;not new&lt;/a&gt;.
It was identified quite a while ago and is inherent in its design. The
technique allowing someone to use this flaw was first published on July
21st and showed how to simply bypass the existing barriers.&lt;br /&gt; Once
again a new barrier that has been put in place to prevent this. This new
procedure has been recommended &lt;a href=&quot;http://cr.yp.to/djbdns/forgery.html&quot; hreflang=&quot;en&quot;&gt;for several years&lt;/a&gt;
and works by using a random source port in the request.&lt;br /&gt; It is important to remember that this measure does not fix the flaw but means that any attack would take longer to succeed.&lt;/p&gt;


&lt;p&gt;The DNS protocol does not guarantee the identity of  individual machines, which makes preventing such attacks more difficult. The DNSSec protocol that
might replace it, is designed to correct this flaw (among other things).
However, and for several reasons, it has not yet been put into place.&lt;br /&gt;
In any case, the solution is to use secure connections, such as SSL
(certificates, signatures and encryption...) when you wish to be sure of the identity
of a site.&lt;br /&gt; But even with all these tools and technologies, it is
still important to pay attention to your web browsers SSL warning
messages  &lt;img src=&quot;/themes/default/smilies/wink.png&quot; alt=&quot;;)&quot; class=&quot;smiley&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    
    
    
      </item>
    
  <item>
    <title>Update of the Gandi Groups platform</title>
    <link>http://iwi.gandibar.net/post/2008/01/18/Update-of-the-Gandi-Groups-platform</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:md5:d96edd5dd2e0ac5f9aa1fefe33e9d9b5</guid>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 10:45:00 +0100</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
        <category>Gandi IWI</category>
            
    <description>    In order to migrate Gandi Groups to version 2.0, we will need to temporarily suspend new posts. It will therefore not be possible to post any messages on the forums between Monday, January 21st and the following Tuesday morning.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thank you for your understanding.</description>
    
    
    
      </item>
    
</channel>
</rss>
